Real or render? Aston Martin V12 Zagato

[epach]

Hey everyone,
One of my coworkers saw one of these pics on my desktop and commented on how nice the car was as well as the CG render itself.
This started a debate on whether the image in question was real (my position) or a render. I showed him the rest of the series of images/renders online and he still thinks it's a render (my other coworkers think it's all rendered too).
I think it's a very nice (real) studio setup with post work done in Photoshop.
What do you guys think?
Here's the link to the gallery: http://www.desktopmachine.com/cars/1...ers.html?t=971

[PBenjamim]

Definetly a studio shot, not a CGcar. Things like dust, marks, reflections, etc.. Are almost impossible to reproduce in cg. Imo.

[epach]

Those are the elements that I thought "gave it away" as a real shot. Hope we can get more people to chip in

[Briex]

yes agree with u PBenjamin....it can be a studio shot even if it seems too clean somehow....and the inside rollbar made me think about cg...but when looking at the exhausts i've been convinced it's real...look at the engine...if it was a concept there would be a black plate

[eswallace]

make you wonder what is really real anymore these days LOL